Laser Partner Web Site
PREVIOUS ARTICLE Oficiální orgán
Společnosti pro využití
laseru v medicíně ČLS JEP
Official paper
of the Czech Society for
the Use of Laser in Medicine
NEXT ARTICLE
 
Vydáváno s oficiální odbornou podporou EMLA

Edited under official scientific support of EMLA
 
  www.laserpartner.cz
On-line česká verze: ISSN 1213-1156
www.laserpartner.org
On-line English version: ISSN 1213-3027
 
    UPClinixperience - All Volumes
      2002
        
  1. Ambulatory Application of Combined Laser Therapy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Dyslipidemia (17.5.2002)

Ambulatory Application of Combined Laser Therapy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Dyslipidemia

T.V. Kovalyova, Out-Patient Department of the 2-nd Municipal Clinical Hospital, Izhevsk, Russia

e-mail: laser@udm.ru

 

Abstract

This study sought to evaluate the dynamics of lipid metabolism in blood plasma and clinical efficiency of combined laser therapy (CLT) in patients with diabetes mellitus.

 

Introduction

Atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is characterized by early development and spreading, that enables to speak about DM as a natural model of atherosclerosis [5]. DM and atherosclerosis are diseases with similar lipid disorders accompanied by hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia and hypo-alpha-cholesterolemia [5]. It is established that under insulin-dependent DM (IDDM) hyperlipoproteinemia is secondary. It results from absolute insulin insufficiency and reduction of lipoprotein lipase activity. Hyperlipoproteinemia may be reversible provided that it is effectively treated. Besides, any dyslipoproteinemia under DM is not only a strong risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis, but also is one of the leading factors in a specific microangiopathy pathogenesis [1,2]. “Usual” for DM patients hypoxia is considerably intensified under dys- and hyperlipoproteinemia, simultaneously increasing insulin defficiency and decreasing receptor sensitivity of cells. It hampers the treatment of patients and promotes the progression of diabetic microangiopathies.

Patients with NIDDM are not protected from CHD caused by qualitative and quantitative changes of blood lipoproteins (LP) [3]. Out of quantitative LP changes characteristic of NIDDM are hypertriglyceridemia and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction [6,15,16,20,25,27] on early stages of the disease [9], which are registered in 20% patients [17,22,26]. According to some investigations [4,7,14] the most common lipid disorder under NIDDM is combined hyperlipidemia, revealed in the high levels of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and the reduced level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c). The most usual lipid disorder under NIDDM is hypertriglyceridemia, in most cases type IV, generally stipulated by the intensified very low-density lipoproteins cholesterol (VLDL-c) synthesis [5]. The HDL-c reduction is revealed both under newly established NIDDM and in patients with a prolonged diabetic record corrected by hypoglycemic preparations and insulin. Some investigations established a connection between insulin resistance and the low level of HDL-c [18]. The HDL-c concentration increases under insulin therapy [21] and weight reduction [3,13]. According to M. Laakso et al. (1988), the HDL-c reduction is of great importance for CHD morbidity and mortality prognosis in patients with NIDDM. The HDL-c reduction down to 0,9 mmol/l and less was accompanied by the fourfold risk of CHD death.

A number of investigations [10,17,22] showed that hypercholesterolemia, stipulated by the increased level of LDL-c, is revealed in 54-77% of patients. Correction of glycemia is accompanied by the reduction of TC and LDL-c level [27]. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) [24] established the interconnection between TC and heart mortality of patients with DM. The obtained results showed that the higher cholesterol level in diabetic patients caused the higher risk of heart death. However, the same cholesterol level caused the higher (3-4 times) CHD mortality in patients with DM as compared to patients without it.

The analysis of not numerous literature showed that there are still no any optimum approaches to lipid disorders treatment under DM. Moreover, dyslipidemia in diabetic patients are not practically corrected at present, that is mainly stipulated by high prices for known drugs.

Objective: This study sought to evaluate the dynamics of lipid metabolism in blood plasma and clinical efficiency of combined laser therapy (CLT) in patients with IDDM and NIDDM.

Materials and Methods

Within the last 2 years in conditions of out-patient department we observed 205 patients with NIDDM and 54 – with IDDM.

The lipidnormalizing effect of CLT in combination with antioxidant therapy (aevit 600 mg a day) we have studied in 60 individuals with NIDDM (8 men and 52 women), mean age - 57,3± 3,2 years, with the level of fasting glycemia no more than 9,0 mmol/l, HbA1c – 7,3± 0,19 and 7,27± 0,23%. The other 29 patients (with NIDDM) constituted the control group and have been treated only by sugar-reducing medications.

In all patients we conducted lipid profile investigation. We also controlled glycemia, enzymatic blood activity (ALT, AST), clinical manifestations of angiopathy and performed the conjunctival biomicroscopy. All examinations have been done prior to treatment, in 2 weeks (i.e. immediately after the treatment), in 8 days, 1, 4 and 9 months after the treatment.

Hypolipidemic action of CLT has been evaluated by the dynamics of TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C and atherogenity rate (AR). Lipid profile has been investigated in venous blood serum taken in the morning hours after 12-14 hours fasting. For trials we used biochemical analyser.  TC - by Enzyme methods (CHOD-PAP), TG - UV enzyme method, HDL-c – after VLDL-c and LDL-c sedimentation by heparin in magnesium ions presence. VLDL-c and LDL-c we determined by W. Friedwald: VLDL-c = TG/5, LDL-c = TC - (HDL-c – VLDL-c). AR has been calculated by A.N. Klimov: AR = TC – HDL-c/HDL-c.

The conjunctival biomicroscopy has been conducted with the help of photoobservation slot lamp. Different parameters of microcirculation (vascular convolution, blood flow speed, arteriovenular interrelations, red blood cell aggregation, etc.) have been assessed.

We performed a staged course treatment within 9 months. Repeated courses were given in 3 and 6 months. Each course consisted of 8-10 sessions of intravenous laser blood irradiation (ILBI) by red spectrum laser, l =0,63 mm, capacity at the light-guide end - 2 mW, exposure - 15-30 min. Simultaneously we conducted a percutaneous procedure by low intensive laser irradiation (LILI) in the near infrared spectrum, l =0,89 mm, capacity at the light-guide end - 5 - 20 mW in combination with magnetic nozzles on gastrocnemius muscle, liver, pancreas, spleen projections - frequency 150 Hz, exposure 4 min. on each zone.

 

Results

29 patients of the control group showed no obvious deviations of blood plasma lipids after 10-days intake of aevit (table 1). This conformity has been also registered under the subsequent courses of antioxidant therapy by aevit in 3 and 6 months.

In the main group of patients (table 2) TC level prior to treatment averaged to 8,2± 0,31 mmol/l, TG - 2,14± 0,08 mmol/l, LDL-c - 7,87± 0,30 mmol/l, HDL-c - 0,99± 0,04 mmol/l. AR made up 7,28± 0,28, LDL/HDL-c ratio - 7,94± 0,30 (with current standard being < 5,0).

Immediately after the conducted therapy no significant deviations of lipid profile have been seen. The level of TC slightly decreased to 7,98± 0,31 (p<0,01). The level of TG even slightly increased until 2,51± 0,09 (p<0,01). In a part of patients the normalization of the examined parameters was accompanied by a temporary elevation of LDL-c from 7,87± 0,30 tî 7,9± 0,30 (p<0,05), that was probably connected with the intensified biosynthesis of lipids, resulting from the improved metabolism in liver. At the same time HDL-c concentration increased from 0,99± 0,04 tî 1,14± 0,04 (p<0,05). AR decreased from 7,28± 0,28 tî 6,00± 0,23 (p<0,05), respectively. LDL/HDL-c ratio made up 6,92± 0,27 (p<0,05).

Hypolipidemic action of CLT has been distinctively revealed in 1 month after the performed treatment with the efficient reduction of TC level from 7,98± 0,31 tî 5,31± 0,20 (đ< 0,01). The tendency to the reduction of TG from 2,51± 0,09 tî 1,69± 0,06 (p<0,01) and elevation of HDL-c from 1,14± 0,04 tî 1,42± 0,05 (p<0,01) has been registered. The level of LDL-c decreased from 7,90± 0,30 tî 6,63± 0,25 (đ<0,05). AR lowered from 6,00± 0,23 tî 2,73± 0,10 (đ<0,01). The LDL/HDL-c ratio decreased from 6,92± 0,27 tî 4,66± 0,18 (p<0,01).

In 9 months the level of TC made up 6,01± 0,23 (p<0,01), TG – 1,62± 0,06 (p<0,01), LDL-c – 5,82± 0,22 (p<0,01), HDL-c – 1,39± 0,05 (p<0,01), AR – 3,30± 0,13 (p<0,001), LDL/HDL-c – 4,18± 0,16 (p<0,01).

Within the whole staged treatment blood plasma lipids in patients of the control group remained practically unchanged.

We also established positive deviations in clinical picture. It manifested in dynamics of general clinical diabetic symptoms, diabetic macropathy of lower limbs under the following scale: pain - sensitiveness to cold - walking, conjunctival biomicroscopy changes. The state of patients, suffering from IDDM and NIDDM complicated by diabetic angiopathy of pelvic limbs, improved in the main group after 2-3 sessions of CLT. Patients showed decrease or disappearance of pain, cramps and paresthesia, “getting warmer” of limbs. No dynamics of clinical picture in the control group have been revealed. By the end of treatment, symptoms of diabetic encephalopathy and asthenia disappeared in all patients. Mood and sleep also improved.

By the end of treatment fasting glycemia in NIDDM patients decreased from 14,21± 0,85 to 11,27± 0,67. In 3 weeks the level of glycemia in this group of patients decreased at most until 6,01± 0,35. Fasting glycemia in IDDM patients even increased from 10,46± 1,46 to 11,82± 1,65. And only after the third week it reduced to 7,45± 1,04. Thus, the distinctive positive effect in respect of carbohydrate metabolism has been reached. Consequently, dosages of insulin and sugarcorrecting medications have been considerably lowered.

The results of ophthalmologic investigation demonstrated the improved retinal blood circulation in the greater part of patients of the main group with diabetic retinopathy. It has been expressed in the normalization of arteriola/venule ratio, reduction of plasmarrhage, resorption of micromacular hemorrhages and retinal edema, improvement of retinal trophism. Under the influence of CLT the blood flow speed in retinal vessels increased by 35-38%, red blood cell aggregation lowered 1,3-1,4 times. Patients of the control group did not show any improvement of retinal blood circulation.

Thus, our experience of the ambulatory application of laser therapy demonstrated the distinct effect in respect of lipid profile normalization. No side effects and complications have been registered.

 

Conclusions

It is safe to say that:

  1. Combined laser therapy enables to avoid the intake of hypolipidemic and lipotropic agents, as in the result of treatment we observed the prolonged effect in respect of the most important, pathogenetically significant deviations of lipid metabolism: a true increase of HDL-c in the nearest catamnesis (which preserves up to 6-10 months) and decrease of LDL-c. Simultaneously we registered a true lowering of TC, TG to the norm or its upper limits. AR reduced more than 3 times and the LDL/HDL-c ratio - twice.

  2. The application of a staged CLT in treatment of patients with IDDM and NIDDM enables to obtain a distinct, long-term, positive effect in respect of carbohydrate metabolism, simultaneously reducing insulin and sugarcorrecting medications dosage. It also results in microcirculation improvement.

 

Tables

Table 1: Dynamics of lipid profile (mmol/l) in patients with diabetes mellitus (M ± m)

Observation periods

Group of patients

TG

(0,40 – 1,53)

TC

(3,9-5,2)

LDL

(3,0-4,5)

HDL

(1,5-3,3)

AR

(2,5-3,5)

Ratio LDL/HDL

(do 5,0)

Initially

I

2,11 ± 0,12

7,92 ± 0,44

7,80 ± 0,43 

0,91 ± 0,05

7,70 ±0,43 

8,57 ± 0,48

After therapy

II (1)

II (2)

2,14 ± 0,10

2,51 ± 0,11

8,20 ± 0,38

7,98 ± 0,37

7,87 ± 0,37

7,90 ± 0,37

0,99 ± 0,04

1,14 ± 0,05

7,28 ± 0,27

6,00 ± 0,23

7,94 ± 0,30

6,92 ± 0,26

In 3 weeks

II (3)

I

1,69 ± 0,07

2,10 ± 0,12

5,31 ± 0,25

7,91 ± 0,44

6,63 ± 0,31

7,79 ± 0,44

1,42 ± 0,06

0,92 ± 0,05

2,73 ± 0,10

7,59 ± 0,42

4,66 ± 0,18

8,46 ± 0,47

Changes, times

p (1 - 2)

p (2 - 3)

p (1 – 3)

1,3

> 0,05

> 0,05

> 0,05

1,54

> 0,05

< 0,05

> 0,05

1,2

> 0,05

> 0,05

> 0,05

1,4

> 0,05

> 0,05

> 0,05

3,3

> 0,05

< 0,05

> 0,05 

2,0

> 0,05

< 0,05

< 0,05

In 3 months:

Before therapy

In 3 weeks

II

II

I

1,72 ± 0,08

1,51 ± 0,07

2,12 ± 0,12

5,42 ± 0,25

5,27 ± 0,24

7,94 ± 0,44

6,21 ± 0,29

5,42 ± 0,25

7,84 ± 0,44

1,61 ± 0,07

1,67 ± 0,07

0,90 ± 0,05

2,37 ± 0,09

2,15 ± 0,10

7,82 ± 0,44

3,85 ± 0,18

3,24 ± 0,15

8,71 ± 0,49

In 6 months:

Before therapy

In 3 weeks

II

II

I

1,62 ± 0,07

1,54 ± 0,07

2,12 ± 0,12

6,01 ± 0,28

5,28 ± 0,24

7, 89 ± 0,44

5,82 ± 0,27

5,70 ± 0,26

7,80 ± 0,44

1,39 ± 0,06

1,42 ± 0,06

0,91 ± 0,05

3,30 ± 0,15

2,70 ± 0,12

7,67 ± 0,43

4,18 ± 0,19

4,00 ± 0,18

8,57 ± 0,48

  I – Control group (n=22) – patients with DM without application of LLLT

  II – Main group (n=37) – patients with DM with application of LLLT

 

Table 2: Rates of glycemia (M ± m)

Observation periods

Group of patients

Glucose, mmol/l
    NIDDM IDDM

Initially

I

14,43 ± 0,86

9,97 ± 1,02

After therapy

II (1)

II (2)

14,21 ± 0,85

11,27 ± 0,67

10,46 ± 1,46

11,82 ± 1,65

In 3 weeks

II (3)

I

 

6,01 ± 0,35

14,32 ± 0,86

 

7,45 ± 1,04

10,12 ± 1,04

 

 

p (1 - 2)

p (2 - 3)

p (1 - 3)

 

> 0,05

< 0,05

< 0,05

 

> 0,05

< 0,05

< 0,05

 

In 3 months:

Before therapy

In 3 weeks

II

II

I

7,98 ± 0,47

6,03 ± 0,36

14,41 ± 0,86

6,38 ± 0,89

5,72 ± 0,79

10,24 ± 1,05

In 6 months:

Before therapy

In 3 weeks

II

II

I

6,81 ± 0,40

6,02 ± 0,36

14,37 ± 0,86

5,89 ± 0,82

5,54 ± 0,77

10,31 ± 1,06

I - Control group (n=22) – patients with DM without application of LLLT -  (IDDM – 10 patients, NIDDM – 20 patients); 

II – Main group (n=37) – patients with DM with application of LLLT - (IDDM – 10 patients, NIDDM – 27 patients).

Reference

  1. Bodiar P.N., Denish G.М., Panasyukova О.R. // Endocrinol. problems. -1984. - №3. - P.19-24.

  2. Yefimov А.S. Diabetic angiopathies.- М., 1989.

  3. Kozlov S.G., Lyakishev А.А. Dyslipoproteinemias and their treatment in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus // Cardiology.- №8.- 1999.- P.59-64.

  4. Roslyakova L.V., Roytman А.P. et al. Blood plasma apolipoproteins spectrum in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus against a background of akarbosa treatment // Clin. med.- 1999.- №10.- P.15-17.

  5. Sokolov E.I. Diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis. - Moscow, 1996.- 404 p.

  6. Assmann G., Schulte H. The Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) Study: prevalence of hyperlipidemia in persons with hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus and the relationship to coronary heart disease // Am.Heart J.- 1988.- Vol.116.- P.1713-1724.

  7. Betteridge D.J. Lipids, diabetes and vascular disease: the time to act diabetic // Medicine.-1989.-N6.-P.195-218.

  8. Fontbonne A., Eschwege E. et al. Hypertriglyceridemia as a risk factor for coronary heart disease mortality in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes. Results from the 11-year follow-up of the Paris Prospective Study // Diabetologia.- 1989.- Vol.32.- P.300-304.

  9. Haffner S.M., Stern M.P., Haruda H.P. et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in confirmed prediabetic individuals: does the clock for coronary heart disease start ticking before the onset of clinical diabetes? // JAMA.- 1990.- Vol.263.- P.2893-2898.

  10. Harris M.I. Hypercholesterolemia in diabetes and glucose intolerance in the U.S. population // Diabetes Care.- 1991.- Vol.14.- P.366-374.

  11. Jaretti R.J., Shipley M.J. Mortality and associated risk factors in diabetics // Acta Endocrinol.-1985.- Vol.110.-P.21-26.

  12. Kannel W.B., McGee D.L. Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: the Framingham Study // Circulation.- 1979.- Vol.59.- P.8-13.

  13. Kennedy L., Walshe K., Hadden D.R. et al. The effect of intensive dietary therapy on serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: a prospective study // Diabetologia.- 1982.- Vol.23.- P.24-29.

  14. Krause H.P., Puls W. Effects of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose on carbohydrate-induced hypertriglyceridemia in wistar rats // Arch.Pharmacol.- 1981.- Vol.11.- P.316.

  15. Laakso M. Epidemiology of Diabetic Dyslipidemia // Diabetes Rev.- 1995.- Vol.3.- P.408-422.

  16. Laakso M., Voutilainen E., Sarlund H. et al. Serum lipids and lipoproteins in middle-aged non-insulin-dependent diabetics // Atherosclerosis.- 1985.- Vol.56.- P.271-281.

  17. Laakso M., Ronnemaa T., Pyorala K. et al. Atherosclerosis vascular disease and its risk factors on non-insulin-dependent diabetic and non-diabetic subjects in Finland // Diabetes Care.- 1988.- Vol.11.- P.449-463.

  18. Laakso M., Sarlund H., Mykkanen L. Insulin resistance is associated with lipid and lipoprotein abnormalities in subjects with varying degrees of glucose tolerance // Arteriosclerosis.- 1990.- Vol.10.- P.223-231.

  19. Lehto S., Ronnemaa T. et al. Dyslipidemia and hyperglycemia predict coronary heart disease events in middle-aged patients with NIDDM // Diabetes.- 1997.- Vol.46.- P.1354-1359.

  20. Pyorala K., Laakso M., Uusitupa M. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: an epidemiologic view // Diabetes Metab. Rev.- 1987.- Vol.3.- P.463-524.

  21. Rabkin S.W., Boyko E., Streja D.A. Changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol after initiation of insulin therapy in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: relationship to changes in body weight // Am. J. Med. Sci.- 1983.- Vol.285.- P.14-18.

  22. Ronnemaa T., Laakso M., Kallio V. et al. Serum lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins and the excessive occurence of coronary heart disease in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients // Am. J. Epidemiol.- 1989.- Vol.130.- P.632-645.

  23. Rosengren A., Welin L., Tsiopogianni A. et al. Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on coronary heart disease and mortality among middle-aged diabetic men: a general population study // Br.Med.J.- 1989.- Vol.299.- P.1127-1131.

  24. Stamler J., Vaccaro O., Neaton J.D. et al. for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Diabetes, other risk factors and 12-year cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial // Diabetes Care.- 1993.- Vol.16.- P.434-444.

  25. Steiner G. The dyslipoproteinemias of diabetes // Atherosclerosis.- 1994.- Vol.110.- P.27-33.

  26. Stern M.P., Patterson J.K., Haffner S.M. et al. Lack of awareness and treatment of hyperlipidemia in type II diabetes in a community survey // JAMA.- 1989.- Vol.262.- P.360-364.

  27. Taskinen M.R. Quantitative and qualitative lipoprotein abnormalities in diabetes mellitus // Diabetes.- 1992.- Vol.41.- Suppl.2- P.12-17.

  28. West K.M., Ahuja M.M. et al. The role of circulating glucose and triglyceride concentrations and their interactions with other “risk factors” as determinants of arterial disease in nine diabetic population samples from WHO multinational study // Diabetes Care.- 1983.- Vol.6.-P.361-369.

*****
Sponzorováno / Sponsored by:


© 1999-2003, Frýda, Praha. All rights reserved. Email: editor@laserpartner.cz .